Home/New York Court of Appeals/Claim of Robbins v. Frohlich

Claim of Robbins v. Frohlich

106 N.E.2d 65, 303 N.Y. 987, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1415
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 23, 1952·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order of Appellate Division and award of Workmen’s Compensation Board reversed and claim dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence to sustain the finding that the employee’s death resulted from an accidental injury suffered while he was engaged upon his work. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmond, Fuld and Froessel, JJ. Conway and Dye, JJ., dissent upon the ground that there is ample evidence to support the finding of the Workmen’s Compensation Board that there was a causal relationship between the employee’s accident and his death.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Robbins v. Frohlich, 106 N.E.2d 65, 303 N.Y. 987, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1415 (N.Y. 1952).

106 N.E.2d 65 (Claim of Robbins v. Frohlich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Wallace v. Nestles Chocolate Co.
286 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Claim of Maricle v. Glazier
121 N.E.2d 549 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
Claim of Sullivan v. B & a Construction, Inc.
120 N.E.2d 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)