Claim of Robbins v. Frohlich

106 N.E.2d 65, 303 N.Y. 987, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1415
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 23, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 106 N.E.2d 65 (Claim of Robbins v. Frohlich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Robbins v. Frohlich, 106 N.E.2d 65, 303 N.Y. 987, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1415 (N.Y. 1952).

Opinion

Order of Appellate Division and award of Workmen’s Compensation Board reversed and claim dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence to sustain the finding that the employee’s death resulted from an accidental injury suffered while he was engaged upon his work. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmond, Fuld and Froessel, JJ. Conway and Dye, JJ., dissent upon the ground that there is ample evidence to support the finding of the Workmen’s Compensation Board that there was a causal relationship between the employee’s accident and his death.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Wallace v. Nestles Chocolate Co.
286 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Claim of Maricle v. Glazier
121 N.E.2d 549 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
Claim of Sullivan v. B & a Construction, Inc.
120 N.E.2d 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 N.E.2d 65, 303 N.Y. 987, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-robbins-v-frohlich-ny-1952.