Claim of Roa v. King Gene Cab Corp.
This text of 89 A.D.2d 935 (Claim of Roa v. King Gene Cab Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. While the standing of appellant to participate in the workers’ compensation proceeding is an issue to be determined upon the appeal, it is clear that appellant has standing to pursue this appeal from the board’s decision denying its motion to reopen. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.2d 935, 452 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-roa-v-king-gene-cab-corp-nyappdiv-1982.