Claim of Ritter v. Marianna Girl Coat Co.
This text of 5 A.D.2d 1019 (Claim of Ritter v. Marianna Girl Coat Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from so much of an order as denies appellants’ motion to strike certain paragraphs from.the third cause of action of the amended complaint on the grounds (1) that said paragraphs are unnecessary and prejudicial (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 103), and (2) that the allegations [1017]*1017contained in said paragraphs are the same as the allegations which were struck from the original complaint. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.D.2d 1019, 172 N.Y.S.2d 793, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-ritter-v-marianna-girl-coat-co-nyappdiv-1958.