Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Richterman v. Semet Solvay Co.

Claim of Richterman v. Semet Solvay Co.

235 A.D. 880
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 880 (Claim of Richterman v. Semet Solvay Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Richterman v. Semet Solvay Co., 235 A.D. 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that there is no evidence of any present existing pyonephrosis, and no evidence showing causal relation between the accident and the abnormal condition of the muscles of the back. All concur, except Hill and MoNamee, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-richterman-v-semet-solvay-co-nyappdiv-1932.