Claim of Rendino v. Continental Can Co.
186 A.D. 924
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 186 A.D. 924 (Claim of Rendino v. Continental Can Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Rendino v. Continental Can Co., 186 A.D. 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
Opinion
Award affirmed. All concurred, except H. T. Kellogg, J., dissenting on the ground that claimant was not acting in the course of his employment when injured while doing work he was not employed to do.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Merillo v. Metal Package Corp.
212 A.D. 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Claim of Hamberg v. Flower City Specialty Co.
202 A.D. 113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
186 A.D. 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-rendino-v-continental-can-co-nyappdiv-1918.