Claim of Rendino v. Continental Can Co.
186 A.D. 924
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1918·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Award affirmed. All concurred, except H. T. Kellogg, J., dissenting on the ground that claimant was not acting in the course of his employment when injured while doing work he was not employed to do.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Rendino v. Continental Can Co., 186 A.D. 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
186 A.D. 924 (Claim of Rendino v. Continental Can Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merillo v. Metal Package Corp.
212 A.D. 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Claim of Hamberg v. Flower City Specialty Co.
202 A.D. 113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)