Claim of Reichel v. Stokol Sales
124 N.E.2d 316, 308 N.Y. 671, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1788
This text of 124 N.E.2d 316 (Claim of Reichel v. Stokol Sales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Reichel v. Stokol Sales, 124 N.E.2d 316, 308 N.Y. 671, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1788 (N.Y. 1954).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lewis, Ch„ J., Conway, Dye and Froessel, JJ. Desmond, Fuld and Van Voobhis, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Van De Water v. Emmadine Farms, Inc.
18 A.D.2d 1119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
124 N.E.2d 316, 308 N.Y. 671, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-reichel-v-stokol-sales-ny-1954.