Claim of Reichel v. Stokol Sales
124 N.E.2d 316, 308 N.Y. 671, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1788
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lewis, Ch„ J., Conway, Dye and Froessel, JJ. Desmond, Fuld and Van Voobhis, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Reichel v. Stokol Sales, 124 N.E.2d 316, 308 N.Y. 671, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1788 (N.Y. 1954).
124 N.E.2d 316 (Claim of Reichel v. Stokol Sales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Van De Water v. Emmadine Farms, Inc.
18 A.D.2d 1119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)