Claim of Re v. Flushing Manor Nursing Home

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Re v. Flushing Manor Nursing Home

60 A.D.2d 710, 401 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14736

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 710 (Claim of Re v. Flushing Manor Nursing Home) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Re v. Flushing Manor Nursing Home, 60 A.D.2d 710, 401 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed February 27, 1975, as amended by decision filed March 17, 1977, August 28, 1975 and February 19, 1976, which found that the claimant gave the employer timely and proper notice of her claim for benefits under section 18 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The board found: "that inasmuch as claimant sought medical attention when she was discharged by the employer three days after the accident and claimant thereafter on May 2, 1974 provided employer with a note from her doctor, the employer was not prejudiced by late notice.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed February 27, 1975, as amended by decision filed March 17, 1977, August 28, 1975 and February 19, 1976, which found that the claimant gave the employer timely and proper notice of her claim for benefits under section 18 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The board found: "that inasmuch as claimant sought medical attention when she was discharged by the employer three days after the accident and claimant thereafter on May 2, 1974 provided employer with a note from her doctor, the employer was not prejudiced by late notice.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 710, 401 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-re-v-flushing-manor-nursing-home-nyappdiv-1977.