Claim of Raff v. Upson Co.
425 N.E.2d 896, 54 N.Y.2d 661, 442 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2615
This text of 425 N.E.2d 896 (Claim of Raff v. Upson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Raff v. Upson Co., 425 N.E.2d 896, 54 N.Y.2d 661, 442 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2615 (N.Y. 1981).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs.
[663]*663There having been no claim for a new injury in 1966, the board’s decision was erroneous as a matter of law.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
425 N.E.2d 896, 54 N.Y.2d 661, 442 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-raff-v-upson-co-ny-1981.