Claim of Pytel v. Carborundum Co.
This text of 273 A.D. 832 (Claim of Pytel v. Carborundum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from an award. The employee is mentally incompetent as the result of the injury. Section 115 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law limits the application of section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The award should be affirmed. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ. [See post, p. 924.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 832, 76 N.Y.S.2d 26, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-pytel-v-carborundum-co-nyappdiv-1948.