Claim of Puschett v. Playland Park, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Puschett v. Playland Park, Inc.

268 A.D. 946, 51 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4345

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 1944·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by claimant from an award of disability compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant was working as an attendant at an amusement park and received four dollars per day. He had worked there a little over a month. During the year previous he had been employed by several firms as a traveling salesman of automotive supplies. The Industrial Board [947] fixed his wage rate under subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen's Compensation Law and declined to consider his previous earnings in employments other than the one in which he was engaged at the time of his injury. Award affirmed, without costs. All concur, [gee post, p. 1073.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by claimant from an award of disability compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant was working as an attendant at an amusement park and received four dollars per day. He had worked there a little over a month. During the year previous he had been employed by several firms as a traveling salesman of automotive supplies. The Industrial Board [947] fixed his wage rate under subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen's Compensation Law and declined to consider his previous earnings in employments other than the one in which he was engaged at the time of his injury. Award affirmed, without costs. All concur, [gee post, p. 1073.]

Claim of Puschett v. Playland Park, Inc., 268 A.D. 946, 51 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

268 A.D. 946 (Claim of Puschett v. Playland Park, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related