Claim of Ptaszynski v. American Sugar Refining Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Ptaszynski v. American Sugar Refining Co.

280 A.D. 905, 115 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6115

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 24, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 280 A.D. 905 (Claim of Ptaszynski v. American Sugar Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Ptaszynski v. American Sugar Refining Co., 280 A.D. 905, 115 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by a self-insured employer from an award of death benefits made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board to the widow of a deceased employee. Decedent was employed as a mechanic in the boiler house of the employer’s sugar refinery. On the morning of November 1, 1946, he became ill and was taken to a hospital. At the hospital it was found that he had suffered a coronary occlusion and he died on the 7th of November, 1946. The board found that decedent sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. Specifically the board found that decedent suffered from a coronary occlusion because of unusual exertion and strain on his part while using force to lift or close a door to an ashpit. The only evidence to sustain this finding are the hearsay declarations of decedent. Hearsay declarations are admissible but in order to establish an accident and injury they must be corroborated by circumstances or other evidence (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 118). We can find no such corroboration in the record before us. Award reversed, on the law, and the claim dismissed, with costs to the employer-appellant. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by a self-insured employer from an award of death benefits made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board to the widow of a deceased employee. Decedent was employed as a mechanic in the boiler house of the employer’s sugar refinery. On the morning of November 1, 1946, he became ill and was taken to a hospital. At the hospital it was found that he had suffered a coronary occlusion and he died on the 7th of November, 1946. The board found that decedent sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. Specifically the board found that decedent suffered from a coronary occlusion because of unusual exertion and strain on his part while using force to lift or close a door to an ashpit. The only evidence to sustain this finding are the hearsay declarations of decedent. Hearsay declarations are admissible but in order to establish an accident and injury they must be corroborated by circumstances or other evidence (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 118). We can find no such corroboration in the record before us. Award reversed, on the law, and the claim dismissed, with costs to the employer-appellant. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D. 905, 115 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-ptaszynski-v-american-sugar-refining-co-nyappdiv-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack