Claim of Polkowski v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Polkowski v. Rosen

252 A.D. 710, 298 N.Y.S. 791, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5830

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 710 (Claim of Polkowski v. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Polkowski v. Rosen, 252 A.D. 710, 298 N.Y.S. 791, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by claimants from a decision of the State Industrial Board denying an award on the ground that claimants were not dependent on their deceased brother. The alleged dependents lived with their father in his home. The decedent also lived there, and made some contribution to the support of the family. The father’s earnings were substantial, and a judgment was recovered for the benefit of the father and mother on account of the death of the deceased, in the sum of $12,000 in a third-party action. Whether the claimants were dependent on the deceased was a question of fact, and the evidence supports the conclusion of the State Industrial Board. Decision unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by claimants from a decision of the State Industrial Board denying an award on the ground that claimants were not dependent on their deceased brother. The alleged dependents lived with their father in his home. The decedent also lived there, and made some contribution to the support of the family. The father’s earnings were substantial, and a judgment was recovered for the benefit of the father and mother on account of the death of the deceased, in the sum of $12,000 in a third-party action. Whether the claimants were dependent on the deceased was a question of fact, and the evidence supports the conclusion of the State Industrial Board. Decision unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 710, 298 N.Y.S. 791, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-polkowski-v-rosen-nyappdiv-1937.