Claim of Pogue v. Crouse Irving Hospital

281 A.D. 931, 119 N.Y.S.2d 842
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 931 (Claim of Pogue v. Crouse Irving Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Pogue v. Crouse Irving Hospital, 281 A.D. 931, 119 N.Y.S.2d 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Appeal by Crouse Irving Hospital and its insurance carrier from decisions and awards of the Workmen’s Compensation Board granting disability compensation to claimant against appellants and disallowing- claims against the other three respondent hospitals. Claimant entered Crouse Irving Hospital as a student nurse on February 1, 1939. From September to December, 1940, claimant worked as an affiliate nurse as a part of her training, at the Middletown State Hospital where the board has found she was exposed to tuberculosis while attending a tubercular patient. Subsequently, claimant worked at the Syracuse City Hospital and the Rochester General Hospital. The board has found that the actual exposure oc-c-urred at the Middletown State Hospital while claimant was in the general employ of appellant. The claims were not timely filed but the board has found that Crouse Irving Hospital made an advanced payment of compensation by furnishing medical attention and hospital care to claimant from April 17, 1941, to May 21, 1941, without charge. The record justifies an inference that Crouse Irving Hospital had some knowledge at that time that claimant was suffering" from a disease contracted in her employment. It does not appear in the record that Crouse Irving Hospital furnished hospital care to all student nurses irrespective of the cause of illness or disability as in Matter of Lombardo v. Endic.ott Johnson Corp. (275 App. Div. 18). Deei[932]*932sions and awards unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpem and Imrie, JJ. [See post, p. 1049.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thiele v. Select Med. Corp.
316 Neb. 338 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
Claim of Pacer v. Graybar Electric Co.
31 A.D.2d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Claim of Gentiluomo v. Rockville Minor Surgery Hospital
7 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Claim of Cook v. Buffalo General Hospital
127 N.E.2d 66 (New York Court of Appeals, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 931, 119 N.Y.S.2d 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-pogue-v-crouse-irving-hospital-nyappdiv-1953.