Claim of Piusinski v. Transit Valley Country Club

259 A.D. 765, 18 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6579
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 13, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 765 (Claim of Piusinski v. Transit Valley Country Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Piusinski v. Transit Valley Country Club, 259 A.D. 765, 18 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Appeal from an award made against employer and insurance carrier for compensation to claimant for disability. Claimant was employed as a golf caddy. He was injured while engaged in a practice game with other caddies, and as a result of such injury lost an eye. The sole question involved is whether the accident arose out of and in the course of his employment. Although not required to play, a fair inference of fact may be drawn from the evidence that he and other caddies were encouraged to play each Monday morning. Such practice was not only for their own amusement but tended to make them more efficient caddies. Moreover, under a rule of the employer, they were then under the rule and supervision of the caddy master. Under such circumstances claimant was not outside of his employment. (Matter of Holst v. New York Stock Exchange, 252 App. Div. 233; Matter of Kenny v. Lord & Taylor, Inc., 254 N. Y. 532.) Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and dismiss the "claim on the ground that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of his employment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramsden v. Shaker Ridge Country Club
23 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Duck v. D'Angelo
32 Misc. 2d 164 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Claim of Tedesco v. General Electric Co.
276 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Auerbach Co. v. Industrial Commission
195 P.2d 245 (Utah Supreme Court, 1948)
Geary v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.
188 P.2d 185 (Montana Supreme Court, 1947)
Dearing v. Union Free School District No. 1
272 A.D.2d 167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
Linderman v. Cownie Furs
13 N.W.2d 677 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1944)
Le Bar v. Ewald Bros. Dairy
13 N.W.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 765, 18 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-piusinski-v-transit-valley-country-club-nyappdiv-1940.