Claim of Pisani v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Pisani v. City of New York

256 A.D. 862, 9 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5167

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 862 (Claim of Pisani v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Pisani v. City of New York, 256 A.D. 862, 9 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an award of three dollars, for medical services, made in form to Antonio Pisani, an employee of the city, a self-insurer, but with a lien thereon to a physician. The award was made upon the finding that the employer did not provide the claimant with proper and adequate medical treatment, and that the employee sought the aid of the physician. There is no evidence to sustain this finding. Award reversed, and claim dismissed. Hill, P. J., Rhodes and McNamee, JJ., concur; Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur also upon the additional ground of res judicata. [See, also, Fifth Ave. Bank of New York v. City of New York, 250 App. Div. 844; 251 id. 714.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an award of three dollars, for medical services, made in form to Antonio Pisani, an employee of the city, a self-insurer, but with a lien thereon to a physician. The award was made upon the finding that the employer did not provide the claimant with proper and adequate medical treatment, and that the employee sought the aid of the physician. There is no evidence to sustain this finding. Award reversed, and claim dismissed. Hill, P. J., Rhodes and McNamee, JJ., concur; Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur also upon the additional ground of res judicata. [See, also, Fifth Ave. Bank of New York v. City of New York, 250 App. Div. 844; 251 id. 714.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 862, 9 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-pisani-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack