Claim of Pirovitz v. Heipershausen Bros.

248 A.D. 797

This text of 248 A.D. 797 (Claim of Pirovitz v. Heipershausen Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Pirovitz v. Heipershausen Bros., 248 A.D. 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Appeal by employer and insurance carrier from an award for 100 per cent permanent loss of use of left eye. From the evidence most favorable to the claimant he lost vision to the extent only of about 65 per cent in the left eye, in which, prior to the accident, his vision was 20/70 normal. Award reversed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, and claim remitted to the Board to make an award in accordance with this decision on the authority of Matter of Bervilacqua v. Clark (225 App. Div. 190; affd. without opinion, 250 N. Y. 589). Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Bervilacqua v. Clark
166 N.E. 335 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Claim of Bervilacqua v. Clark
225 A.D. 190 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-pirovitz-v-heipershausen-bros-nyappdiv-1936.