Claim of Pickworth v. Dwyer Electric Co.

230 N.E.2d 729, 20 N.Y.2d 781, 284 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1204
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 28, 1967·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan and Breitel. Judges Vast Voorhis, Burke and Keating dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board on the ground that there is substantial evidence in this record to support the finding of the Referee, affirmed by the board, that the date of disability was February 1, 1964, which would make the claim for reimbursement timely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Pickworth v. Dwyer Electric Co., 230 N.E.2d 729, 20 N.Y.2d 781, 284 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1204 (N.Y. 1967).

230 N.E.2d 729 (Claim of Pickworth v. Dwyer Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Stokes v. Valeo Electrical Systems, Inc.
44 A.D.3d 1223 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Claim of Gilfus v. General Crushed Stone Co.
53 A.D.2d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)