Claim of Peterson v. Acme Electric Corp.

277 A.D.2d 820

This text of 277 A.D.2d 820 (Claim of Peterson v. Acme Electric Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Peterson v. Acme Electric Corp., 277 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The employer’s plant is located in Cuba, N. Y. Claimant lives in Olean, fourteen miles away. Claimant was injured in a bus owned by the employer and used to transport employees to and from the plant. A fare was charged; but the transportation service was only for employees, aiid was not furnished to the public. The transportation was carried on at a loss. There was proof in the record that at the time of the accident workers from outside Cuba were necessary to keep the plant in operation and that there would have been difficulty in obtaining employees outside of that village unless transportation was afforded. There is some other testimony to indicate that the buses were run in the interest of the employer’s business, and that being so, the accident must be treated as would any other occurring on the employer’s premises while the employees were moving toward the place of work. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-peterson-v-acme-electric-corp-nyappdiv-1950.