Claim of Pepin v. Mussen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Pepin v. Mussen

249 A.D. 883, 292 N.Y.S. 555, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10065

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 1937·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division on typewritten record denied, on the ground that the claimant has failed to show a meritorious claim. The evidence discloses that the business of the employer was that of a dairy farmer. Claimant was employed to assist in the construction of a tenement building, and while so engaged was injured. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division on typewritten record denied, on the ground that the claimant has failed to show a meritorious claim. The evidence discloses that the business of the employer was that of a dairy farmer. Claimant was employed to assist in the construction of a tenement building, and while so engaged was injured. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Claim of Pepin v. Mussen, 249 A.D. 883, 292 N.Y.S. 555, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

249 A.D. 883 (Claim of Pepin v. Mussen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.