Claim of Pepe v. Sheffield Farms Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Pepe v. Sheffield Farms Co.

254 A.D. 611, 2 N.Y.S.2d 841

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 611 (Claim of Pepe v. Sheffield Farms Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Pepe v. Sheffield Farms Co., 254 A.D. 611, 2 N.Y.S.2d 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal from an award of the State Industrial Board. The injury occurred on December 19, 1934. Claims were filed on July 8, 1937, and September 25,1937. There was no question about the accident and causal relation. The Statute of Limitations was raised. The occurrence was known to the employer promptly, and the employer furnished medical attention and surgical appliances at once, and paid full wages during the period of disability following the accident. Advance payment having been made to the employee the claimant is not barred by the Statute of Limitations under section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal from an award of the State Industrial Board. The injury occurred on December 19, 1934. Claims were filed on July 8, 1937, and September 25,1937. There was no question about the accident and causal relation. The Statute of Limitations was raised. The occurrence was known to the employer promptly, and the employer furnished medical attention and surgical appliances at once, and paid full wages during the period of disability following the accident. Advance payment having been made to the employee the claimant is not barred by the Statute of Limitations under section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 611, 2 N.Y.S.2d 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-pepe-v-sheffield-farms-co-nyappdiv-1938.