Claim of Pelow v. Sork Enterprises, Ltd.
309 N.E.2d 130, 33 N.Y.2d 944, 353 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1742
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion by Presiding Justice Heblihy at the Appellate Division.
Concur: Judges Gabbielli, Jones, Wachtleb, Babin and Stevens. Chief Judge Bbeitel and Judge Jasen dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Board on the ground that there was substantial evidence before the board to support the determination that decedent was in reality an employee of Sork Enterprises, Ltd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Pelow v. Sork Enterprises, Ltd., 309 N.E.2d 130, 33 N.Y.2d 944, 353 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1742 (N.Y. 1974).
309 N.E.2d 130 (Claim of Pelow v. Sork Enterprises, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Foley v. Mobil Chemical Co.
170 Misc. 2d 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)
Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. v. New York Shipping Ass'n
688 F. Supp. 1560 (S.D. New York, 1988)
Refined Sugars, Inc. v. Local 807 Labor-Management Pension Fund
632 F. Supp. 630 (S.D. New York, 1986)
In Re Seatrain Lines, Inc.
46 B.R. 320 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Kelly v. Major Brand Gasoline Corp.
63 A.D.2d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Albany College of Pharmacy v. Ross
94 Misc. 2d 389 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)