Claim of Pawela v. Niagara From the Air, Inc.

264 A.D. 962, 37 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5551
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 1942·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The only question is whether the claimant’s injury arose out of and in the course of Ms employment. The claimant worked for the employer as a mechanic. His hours were from 9:00 a. m. to 6:00 p. m. He was engaged in the repair of aircraft and aircraft engines and he worked in the maeMne shop and hangars. The employer was engaged in the business of teaching people how to fly aeroplanes and conducting a welding school. The only way to roach the employer’s premises was by an independently owned automobile. While he was helping a student to start Ms car he was injured on the premises of the employer. It was customary for such assistance to be rendered. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present —■ Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Pawela v. Niagara From the Air, Inc., 264 A.D. 962, 37 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5551 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

264 A.D. 962 (Claim of Pawela v. Niagara From the Air, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayes v. Ambassador Court, Inc.
156 A.2d 11 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Green v. De Furia
116 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955)