Claim of Patterson v. Vreeland

16 A.D.2d 722, 226 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10334

This text of 16 A.D.2d 722 (Claim of Patterson v. Vreeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Patterson v. Vreeland, 16 A.D.2d 722, 226 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board awarding death benefits. The appellants contend there is no substantial evidence to support the finding that death in 1958 was causally related to the injury in 1953. The decedent sustained a compensable heart accident in 1953 which contributed to his fatal heart accident in 1958. During this period when the decedent was disabled, he was paid full compensation and periodic medical reports were filed, all of which related the finding of permanent condition to the original accident. There was conflicting medical testimony as to whether [723]*723his death was causally related to the 1953 accident and the board made a factual finding of such relationship which is supported by substantial evidence. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 A.D.2d 722, 226 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-patterson-v-vreeland-nyappdiv-1962.