Claim of Patella v. Accettola

203 A.D.2d 884, 612 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4351
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeals from three decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 7, 1992, November 5, 1992 and April 14, 1993, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant had sustained an occupational disease.

The employer argues that claimant did not sustain an occupational disease because her duties were not the typical [885]*885duties of a receptionist. Assuming, arguendo, that this issue was properly preserved for our review, we find no basis for reversing the Board’s decisions. The finding that claimant’s condition constituted an occupational disease should in all respects be upheld.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Patella v. Accettola, 203 A.D.2d 884, 612 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 884 (Claim of Patella v. Accettola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Bates v. Marine Midland Bank
256 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)