Claim of Patella v. Accettola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Patella v. Accettola

203 A.D.2d 884, 612 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4351

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 A.D.2d 884 (Claim of Patella v. Accettola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Patella v. Accettola, 203 A.D.2d 884, 612 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals from three decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 7, 1992, November 5, 1992 and April 14, 1993, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant had sustained an occupational disease.

The employer argues that claimant did not sustain an occupational disease because her duties were not the typical [885]*885duties of a receptionist. Assuming, arguendo, that this issue was properly preserved for our review, we find no basis for reversing the Board’s decisions. The finding that claimant’s condition constituted an occupational disease should in all respects be upheld.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals from three decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 7, 1992, November 5, 1992 and April 14, 1993, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant had sustained an occupational disease.

The employer argues that claimant did not sustain an occupational disease because her duties were not the typical [885]*885duties of a receptionist. Assuming, arguendo, that this issue was properly preserved for our review, we find no basis for reversing the Board’s decisions. The finding that claimant’s condition constituted an occupational disease should in all respects be upheld.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 884, 612 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-patella-v-accettola-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack