Claim of Pascalicchio v. Mule

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Pascalicchio v. Mule

271 A.D.2d 762

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 18, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 762 (Claim of Pascalicchio v. Mule) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Pascalicchio v. Mule, 271 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by employer and his insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in favor of the claimant. The claimant was employed as a barber by one Salvatore Mule. On June 23, 1945, while the claimant was engaged in barbering a patron, a eoemployee, without warning, attacked him and slashed him, as a result of which the claimant suffered serious injuries as well as permanent facial and neck disfigurement. The contention of the appellants is that the injuries did not arise out of the employment. It is conceded that they were sustained in the course of such employment. The board found that the injuries arose out of the employment and occurred in the course of such employment. The evidence amply sustains the finding. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by employer and his insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board in favor of the claimant. The claimant was employed as a barber by one Salvatore Mule. On June 23, 1945, while the claimant was engaged in barbering a patron, a eoemployee, without warning, attacked him and slashed him, as a result of which the claimant suffered serious injuries as well as permanent facial and neck disfigurement. The contention of the appellants is that the injuries did not arise out of the employment. It is conceded that they were sustained in the course of such employment. The board found that the injuries arose out of the employment and occurred in the course of such employment. The evidence amply sustains the finding. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-pascalicchio-v-mule-nyappdiv-1946.