Claim of Parrish v. Premier Cabinet Corp.

230 A.D. 529, 245 N.Y.S. 320, 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8663
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 A.D. 529 (Claim of Parrish v. Premier Cabinet Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Parrish v. Premier Cabinet Corp., 230 A.D. 529, 245 N.Y.S. 320, 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record is devoid of evidence that this hopper, a part of an automatic coal stoker for a furnace, was or could be heated to such an extent as to cremate completely, within the given time, a man six feet four inches in height and weighing 214 .pounds. There is no evidence that he did fall into the hopper or was cremated in it except that a charred shoe which looked like his, and which contained the burned remains of a human foot, was found on the floor near the hopper. Even the finding of the shoe near the hopper was proven by hearsay only. Assuming, [530]*530however, that this finding of cremation is not incredible, we think that, if he did meet his death in that way, intoxication was the sole cause of the accident. The presumption that death did not result solely from intoxication (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 21, subd. 4) disappeared in the face of substantial and undisputed testimony to the contrary. There is but one inference to draw, and that is that deceased, who was intoxicated when last seen, could not have fallen into this hopper and been cremated unless it was due to intoxication. We think there was no evidence to sustain the award.

The award should be reversed and the claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.

Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Hasbrouck, J., dissents and votes for affirmance.

Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Shannon v. American Can Co.
278 A.D. 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 A.D. 529, 245 N.Y.S. 320, 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-parrish-v-premier-cabinet-corp-nyappdiv-1930.