Claim of Paclucci v. Triangle Conduit Co.
220 A.D. 793
Opinion
Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that there is no evidence to sustain the finding of wage rate of twenty dollars per week, on the authority of Gruber v. Kramer Amusement Corp. (207 App. Div. 564). Cochrane, P. J., Van Burk, Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Paclucci v. Triangle Conduit Co., 220 A.D. 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
220 A.D. 793 (Claim of Paclucci v. Triangle Conduit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gruber v. Kramer Amusement Corp.
207 A.D. 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)