Claim of Ostroff v. Kipnis Bros. Radiator Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Ostroff v. Kipnis Bros. Radiator Corp.

243 A.D. 659

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 659 (Claim of Ostroff v. Kipnis Bros. Radiator Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Ostroff v. Kipnis Bros. Radiator Corp., 243 A.D. 659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Claimant’s weekly wage was fixed at forty-six dollars and sixteen cents. After the accident it was twenty-five per cent less. An award of eight dollars, being the minimum under subdivision 6 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, was made instead of seven dollars and sixty-nine cents, which is sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the diminution. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant’s weekly wage was fixed at forty-six dollars and sixteen cents. After the accident it was twenty-five per cent less. An award of eight dollars, being the minimum under subdivision 6 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, was made instead of seven dollars and sixty-nine cents, which is sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the diminution. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-ostroff-v-kipnis-bros-radiator-corp-nyappdiv-1935.