Claim of Orto v. Poggioni

245 A.D. 782
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 245 A.D. 782 (Claim of Orto v. Poggioni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Orto v. Poggioni, 245 A.D. 782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Claimant, a carpenter, was injured in the course of his employment on October 23,1931, at eleven-thirty a. m. Several days prior thereto the employer had entered into negotiations with one Lane, a broker, to secure compensation insurance in connection with the work which claimant was employed to do. Lane took the matter up with the insurance carrier’s agents. The employer assumed that he was covered by insurance. At four-three p. m. on the date of the accident Lane actually secured a policy of insurance from the insurance carrier effective from October 23, 1931, to October 23, 1932, at twelve and one minute o’clock a. m. standard time. The employer’s good faith is not questioned and there is no charge of fraud. There is no testimony that the broker knew at the time he obtained the insurance that claimant had been injured. The carrier collected the premium on the policy and made no attempt to cancel it. On the hearing before the Industrial Board the insurance carrier attempted to have the policy reformed. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. (Matter of Weydman v. Niagara Boiler Works, 264 N. Y. 503; Commercial Insurance Co. v. Hallock, 27 N. J. L. 645; Martin v. New York Life Ins. Co., 30 N. M. 400; Tibbits v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co., 159 Ind. 671; Rose v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 240 Ill. 45; 14 R. C. L. 878, 943; 32 C. J. 1109, and eases there cited.) Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

AMERICAN MILLENNIUM INS. CO. v. Berganza
902 A.2d 266 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
Oster v. Riley
150 N.W.2d 43 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)
Canadian Indemnity Company v. Leo Tacke
257 F.2d 342 (Ninth Circuit, 1958)
Giles v. Commercial Casualty Insurance
251 A.D. 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-orto-v-poggioni-nyappdiv-1935.