Claim of Ortiz v. White Plains Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Ortiz v. White Plains Board of Education

33 A.D.2d 1065, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5567

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 1065 (Claim of Ortiz v. White Plains Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Ortiz v. White Plains Board of Education, 33 A.D.2d 1065, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks an order directing the board to accept as timely a notice of appeal from a decision filed August 7, 1969, denied, without costs. (See Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23.) Motion, insofar as it seeks an order directing the board to accept as timely a notice of appeal from a decision dated October 20, 1969 denying an application for reconsideration, granted, without costs. Upon this appeal, our review is limited to the question whether the board’s action was arbitrary and capricious. (Matter of Fairbanks v. Brewer-Titchener Corp., 25 A D 2d 583.) Herlihy, P. J,, Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks an order directing the board to accept as timely a notice of appeal from a decision filed August 7, 1969, denied, without costs. (See Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23.) Motion, insofar as it seeks an order directing the board to accept as timely a notice of appeal from a decision dated October 20, 1969 denying an application for reconsideration, granted, without costs. Upon this appeal, our review is limited to the question whether the board’s action was arbitrary and capricious. (Matter of Fairbanks v. Brewer-Titchener Corp., 25 A D 2d 583.) Herlihy, P. J,, Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 1065, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-ortiz-v-white-plains-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1970.