Claim of Orlando v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Orlando v. Rosen

248 A.D. 924, 290 N.Y.S. 270, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8090

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 924 (Claim of Orlando v. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Orlando v. Rosen, 248 A.D. 924, 290 N.Y.S. 270, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Question is coverage. The original policy was written to expire on “ Nov. 11th, 1934, at twelve and one minute o’clock a. m. standard time.” By a rider the pokey was extended “ for a period of One (1) Month, to expire on December 11th 1934. * * * Subject otherwise to all the terms, limits and conditions of the policy to which this endorsement is attested.” Claimant was injured at two p. m. on December 11, 1934. The policy had expired some hours earlier. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P, J., MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents on the ground that the policy of the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company did not expire until the end of December 11, 1934.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Question is coverage. The original policy was written to expire on “ Nov. 11th, 1934, at twelve and one minute o’clock a. m. standard time.” By a rider the pokey was extended “ for a period of One (1) Month, to expire on December 11th 1934. * * * Subject otherwise to all the terms, limits and conditions of the policy to which this endorsement is attested.” Claimant was injured at two p. m. on December 11, 1934. The policy had expired some hours earlier. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P, J., MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents on the ground that the policy of the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company did not expire until the end of December 11, 1934.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 924, 290 N.Y.S. 270, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-orlando-v-rosen-nyappdiv-1936.