Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of O'Neill v. Kirkman & Son, Inc.

Claim of O'Neill v. Kirkman & Son, Inc.

248 A.D. 930, 290 N.Y.S. 274, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8105
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 2, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 930 (Claim of O'Neill v. Kirkman & Son, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of O'Neill v. Kirkman & Son, Inc., 248 A.D. 930, 290 N.Y.S. 274, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Claimant slipped and fell upon a concrete floor. The employer manufactures soap products. Claimant testified that she slipped because there was soap on her shoes. Failure [931]*931to give written notice within thirty days properly excused by the Board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 930, 290 N.Y.S. 274, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-oneill-v-kirkman-son-inc-nyappdiv-1936.