Claim of Nunez v. Tesser Textile Co.

79 A.D.2d 800, 435 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14209
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1980·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed [801] October 11, 1979. A majority of the board panel found: “based on the record and medical testimony, particularly that of Dr. Brodman, that claimant’s work activities which involved prolonged standing and loading of material on trucks aggravated the pre-existing varicose veins. The Majority finds that the pathology and disability that followed were causally related and constitute an occupational disease within the meaning of the Law.” There is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s decision. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Nunez v. Tesser Textile Co., 79 A.D.2d 800, 435 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

79 A.D.2d 800 (Claim of Nunez v. Tesser Textile Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKillop v. McKillop Funeral Livery, Inc.
188 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)