Claim of Nudo v. Carborundum Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Nudo v. Carborundum Co.

272 A.D.2d 1092

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1092 (Claim of Nudo v. Carborundum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Nudo v. Carborundum Co., 272 A.D.2d 1092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the Carborundum Company, employer, and Travelers Insurance Company, carrier, from a decision made by a referee and a decision made by the Compensation Board which held that the provisions of subdivision 8-a [1093]*1093[repealed by L. 1945, eh. 872] of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law were not applicable to the case at bar. The claimant was injured while putting a mold weighing about sixty-five pounds on a press and while doing so he missed the opening and the mold slipped off the large press. He attempted to prevent it from falling and in doing so twisted his body and experienced pain in both groins, with resulting hernia. The board found that claimant was permanently partially disabled at the time of the employment by the Carborundum Company, employer, on March 17, 1942, and that the provisions of subdivision 8-a of section 15 had no application. The evidence sustains the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part. [See post, p. 1095.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the Carborundum Company, employer, and Travelers Insurance Company, carrier, from a decision made by a referee and a decision made by the Compensation Board which held that the provisions of subdivision 8-a [1093]*1093[repealed by L. 1945, eh. 872] of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law were not applicable to the case at bar. The claimant was injured while putting a mold weighing about sixty-five pounds on a press and while doing so he missed the opening and the mold slipped off the large press. He attempted to prevent it from falling and in doing so twisted his body and experienced pain in both groins, with resulting hernia. The board found that claimant was permanently partially disabled at the time of the employment by the Carborundum Company, employer, on March 17, 1942, and that the provisions of subdivision 8-a of section 15 had no application. The evidence sustains the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part. [See post, p. 1095.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-nudo-v-carborundum-co-nyappdiv-1947.