Claim of Nole v. Trustees of the Village of Tuckahoe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Nole v. Trustees of the Village of Tuckahoe

22 A.D.2d 716, 253 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3051

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 716 (Claim of Nole v. Trustees of the Village of Tuckahoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Nole v. Trustees of the Village of Tuckahoe, 22 A.D.2d 716, 253 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Claimant, a school crossing guard, working three short shifts daily, testified that she was customarily picked up by a police car at a particular intersection, where a police call box was located (and utilized by her, on at least some occasions, to summon the police car), and was transported thence to the crossing to which she was regularly assigned; and that occasionally she would be picked up if a police ear should happen to encounter her as she walked to the intersection or after she had left the intersection, should she start to walk therefrom to her assigned crossing without awaiting the police car. She was injured on her way from her home to her second shift, while walking toward the intersection and while some distance therefrom. The board was entitled to find, as it did, that, when injured, “ claimant had not yet arrived at the station at which her emloyment was to begin ” and we are without authority to disturb that factual determination and the resultant dis-allowance of the claim. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Claimant, a school crossing guard, working three short shifts daily, testified that she was customarily picked up by a police car at a particular intersection, where a police call box was located (and utilized by her, on at least some occasions, to summon the police car), and was transported thence to the crossing to which she was regularly assigned; and that occasionally she would be picked up if a police ear should happen to encounter her as she walked to the intersection or after she had left the intersection, should she start to walk therefrom to her assigned crossing without awaiting the police car. She was injured on her way from her home to her second shift, while walking toward the intersection and while some distance therefrom. The board was entitled to find, as it did, that, when injured, “ claimant had not yet arrived at the station at which her emloyment was to begin ” and we are without authority to disturb that factual determination and the resultant dis-allowance of the claim. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 716, 253 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-nole-v-trustees-of-the-village-of-tuckahoe-nyappdiv-1964.