Claim of Murnin v. Berry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Murnin v. Berry

268 A.D. 841, 50 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3713

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 20, 1944·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the State Industrial Board ruling that a payment of a medical bill within three years from the date of an application to reopen the ease was a payment of compensation within three years and therefore, the case was not a charge against the special fund created under section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, although the medical services themselves were furnished more than three years before the date of the application to reopen. Decision affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board against appellant, on the authority of Matter of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry (293 N. Y. 222). All concur. [See post, p. 935.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the State Industrial Board ruling that a payment of a medical bill within three years from the date of an application to reopen the ease was a payment of compensation within three years and therefore, the case was not a charge against the special fund created under section 25-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, although the medical services themselves were furnished more than three years before the date of the application to reopen. Decision affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board against appellant, on the authority of Matter of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry (293 N. Y. 222). All concur. [See post, p. 935.]

Claim of Murnin v. Berry, 268 A.D. 841, 50 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

268 A.D. 841 (Claim of Murnin v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related