Claim of Mundt v. William Spencer & Son Contracting Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Mundt v. William Spencer & Son Contracting Corp.

242 A.D. 882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 882 (Claim of Mundt v. William Spencer & Son Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Mundt v. William Spencer & Son Contracting Corp., 242 A.D. 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Decision reversed, and matter remitted, with costs to the claimants against-the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the finding that the decedent, John Mundt, was engaged in a maritime employment at the time he sustained the injury which resulted in his death, is without evidence to support it. The accident occurred when the decedent was on the land. (Smith & Sons v. Taylor, 276 U. S. 179.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decision reversed, and matter remitted, with costs to the claimants against-the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the finding that the decedent, John Mundt, was engaged in a maritime employment at the time he sustained the injury which resulted in his death, is without evidence to support it. The accident occurred when the decedent was on the land. (Smith & Sons v. Taylor, 276 U. S. 179.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mundt-v-william-spencer-son-contracting-corp-nyappdiv-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack