Claim of Mundt v. William Spencer & Son Contracting Corp.

242 A.D. 882
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Claim of Mundt v. William Spencer & Son Contracting Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 250 A.D. 693

Opinion

Decision reversed, and matter remitted, with costs to the claimants against-the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the finding that the decedent, John Mundt, was engaged in a maritime employment at the time he sustained the injury which resulted in his death, is without evidence to support it. The accident occurred when the decedent was on the land. (Smith & Sons v. Taylor, 276 U. S. 179.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Mundt v. William Spencer & Son Contracting Corp., 242 A.D. 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

242 A.D. 882 (Claim of Mundt v. William Spencer & Son Contracting Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Taylor
276 U.S. 179 (Supreme Court, 1928)