Claim of Mueller v. David E. Kennedy, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Mueller v. David E. Kennedy, Inc.

246 A.D. 872

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

The employee was injured in Detroit. He had worked seventeen years continuously for the same employer, a soft tile contractor with its principal place of business at 16 East Fifty-second street, New York city, and its factory at 58 Second avenue, Brooklyn. The Board has found the work was incidental to the New York business. The facts sustain the inference. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The employee was injured in Detroit. He had worked seventeen years continuously for the same employer, a soft tile contractor with its principal place of business at 16 East Fifty-second street, New York city, and its factory at 58 Second avenue, Brooklyn. The Board has found the work was incidental to the New York business. The facts sustain the inference. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Claim of Mueller v. David E. Kennedy, Inc., 246 A.D. 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

246 A.D. 872 (Claim of Mueller v. David E. Kennedy, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.