Claim of Mueller v. David E. Kennedy, Inc.
This text of 246 A.D. 872 (Claim of Mueller v. David E. Kennedy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The employee was injured in Detroit. He had worked seventeen years continuously for the same employer, a soft tile contractor with its principal place of business at 16 East Fifty-second street, New York city, and its factory at 58 Second avenue, Brooklyn. The Board has found the work was incidental to the New York business. The facts sustain the inference. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mueller-v-david-e-kennedy-inc-nyappdiv-1936.