Claim of Mosher v. Cashmere Grotto No. 11
This text of 257 A.D. 886 (Claim of Mosher v. Cashmere Grotto No. 11) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The claimant was employed as the maintenance man of an amusement park. He developed a sore leg, which caused him pain, and which he thought required attention of a doctor. The employer gave him permission to go to a doctor, and at the same time directed him to make purchases for the employer of merchandise which was necessary for resale that night. The custodian of the park, and the superior of claimant, testified that the merchandise was essential for use that day in the business of the employer, and that he told claimant to bring it back when he came from the doctor’s. According to the testimony of the employer, it was necessary to make the trip and purchase whether the claimant saw the doctor or not. (Flatter of Marks v. Gray, 251 N. Y. 90.) Decision reversed, and matter remitted to the State Industrial Board, with costs to the appellant against the employer and the insurance carrier. All concur, except Crapser and Bliss, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm the decision of the Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 A.D. 886, 12 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mosher-v-cashmere-grotto-no-11-nyappdiv-1939.