Claim of Montanari v. Lehigh Portland Cement Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Montanari v. Lehigh Portland Cement Co.

282 A.D. 1082, 126 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5873

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 282 A.D. 1082 (Claim of Montanari v. Lehigh Portland Cement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Montanari v. Lehigh Portland Cement Co., 282 A.D. 1082, 126 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The claimant was employed as a laborer by the appellant Lehigh Portland Cement Company. He worked in a shanty checking the weight of trucks which stood on a scale outside the shanty. The floor of the shanty was concrete, covered in part with corrugated paper. While the claimant was sitting on a bench warming his feet on an electric heater, he fell and hit his shoulder on the floor, causing a dislocation of the left clavicle. The claimant was found in a semi-conscious condition. The medical proof was to the effect that the claimant suffered from generalized arteriosclerosis, of nonoecupational origin, and that this caused him to ■ lose consciousness and to fall. There is no basis for an award in this ease. The employment did not contribute in any substantial degree to the hazard of the fall (Matter of Ti asar o v. Ford Motor Go., 280 App. Div. 266, motion for leave to appeal denied 304 N". Y. 986; Larson on Workmen’s Compensation, “Idiopathic falls”, §§ 12.10 to 12.14). The board’s memorandum suggests that the claimant may have tripped over the heater but there is no evidence in the record to sustain this suggestion and the board's formal finding is simply to the effect that the claimant “ fell to the concrete floor ”. Decision and award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs to the appellants against the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The claimant was employed as a laborer by the appellant Lehigh Portland Cement Company. He worked in a shanty checking the weight of trucks which stood on a scale outside the shanty. The floor of the shanty was concrete, covered in part with corrugated paper. While the claimant was sitting on a bench warming his feet on an electric heater, he fell and hit his shoulder on the floor, causing a dislocation of the left clavicle. The claimant was found in a semi-conscious condition. The medical proof was to the effect that the claimant suffered from generalized arteriosclerosis, of nonoecupational origin, and that this caused him to ■ lose consciousness and to fall. There is no basis for an award in this ease. The employment did not contribute in any substantial degree to the hazard of the fall (Matter of Ti asar o v. Ford Motor Go., 280 App. Div. 266, motion for leave to appeal denied 304 N". Y. 986; Larson on Workmen’s Compensation, “Idiopathic falls”, §§ 12.10 to 12.14). The board’s memorandum suggests that the claimant may have tripped over the heater but there is no evidence in the record to sustain this suggestion and the board's formal finding is simply to the effect that the claimant “ fell to the concrete floor ”. Decision and award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs to the appellants against the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 1082, 126 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-montanari-v-lehigh-portland-cement-co-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack