Claim of Mojica v. Marlene Modes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Mojica v. Marlene Modes, Inc.

12 A.D.2d 688, 207 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6764

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 688 (Claim of Mojica v. Marlene Modes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Mojica v. Marlene Modes, Inc., 12 A.D.2d 688, 207 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant testified that she felt a pain in her arm while putting a hat on a block and pulling it hard in the course of employment. The proof offered by the employer was that no report or discussion of any injury or incident occurred at the time of alleged occurrence. The board, overruling the Referee’s decision, has denied claimant compensation. This decision, whether or not there was an “ accident ”, is entirely within the area of fact-finding and on this record we feel required to affirm the board. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant testified that she felt a pain in her arm while putting a hat on a block and pulling it hard in the course of employment. The proof offered by the employer was that no report or discussion of any injury or incident occurred at the time of alleged occurrence. The board, overruling the Referee’s decision, has denied claimant compensation. This decision, whether or not there was an “ accident ”, is entirely within the area of fact-finding and on this record we feel required to affirm the board. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 688, 207 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mojica-v-marlene-modes-inc-nyappdiv-1960.