Claim of Modra v. Little
181 A.D. 914
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1917
StatusPublished
This text of 181 A.D. 914 (Claim of Modra v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Modra v. Little, 181 A.D. 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
Award affirmed. All concurred, except Kellogg, P. J., and Lyon, J.; dissenting on authority of Matter of Grammici v. Zinn (219 N. Y. 322); Matter of Kanzar v. Acorn Mfg. Co. (Id. 326); Matter of Boscarino v. Carfagno & Dragonette (220 id. 323), and Carkey v. Island Paper Co. (177 App. Div. 73).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of Grammici v. . Zinn
114 N.E. 397 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Claim of Carkey v. Island Paper Co.
177 A.D. 73 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 A.D. 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-modra-v-little-nyappdiv-1917.