Claim of Modra v. Little
181 A.D. 914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1917·Published
Opinion
Award affirmed. All concurred, except Kellogg, P. J., and Lyon, J.; dissenting on authority of Matter of Grammici v. Zinn (219 N. Y. 322); Matter of Kanzar v. Acorn Mfg. Co. (Id. 326); Matter of Boscarino v. Carfagno & Dragonette (220 id. 323), and Carkey v. Island Paper Co. (177 App. Div. 73).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Modra v. Little, 181 A.D. 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
181 A.D. 914 (Claim of Modra v. Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Grammici v. . Zinn
114 N.E. 397 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Claim of Carkey v. Island Paper Co.
177 A.D. 73 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)