Claim of Mittiga v.United States Aluminum Co.
227 A.D. 680
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, on the ground that no appeal lies from a denial of application to reopen. Present — Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Mittiga v.United States Aluminum Co., 227 A.D. 680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
227 A.D. 680 (Claim of Mittiga v.United States Aluminum Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. Einbinder
304 F.2d 629 (D.C. Circuit, 1962)
Claim of McLaskey v. City of New York
277 A.D.2d 1068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Claim of Conklin v. A. R. Dowd Co.
251 A.D. 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Claim of Strand v. Harris Structural Steel Co.
234 A.D. 341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)