Claim of Minchie v. Corning Glass Works

285 A.D. 1097, 139 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6763
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 285 A.D. 1097 (Claim of Minchie v. Corning Glass Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Minchie v. Corning Glass Works, 285 A.D. 1097, 139 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

Appeal by self-insured employer from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board to claimant for total permanent disability resulting from silicosis contracted during his employment. Claimant had'been employed by this employer for approximately forty-four years. He concededly contracted silicosis during his employment in the “ pot and clay ” department prior to 1934. Thereafter he was given other employment in the same plant. There is medical evidence that he became totally and permanently disabled on October 1, 1950, as a result of silicosis contracted in his employment. Appellant urges that there is no substantial evidence that claimant was injuriously exposed within two years of his disablement, under section 44-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. There is sufficient evidence that claimant was exposed to dust during his entire employment. Moreover, claimant is entitled to the benefit of the provisions of section 40 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, because it is undisputed and the board has found that claimant contracted the disease in the same employment with the same employer by whom he was employed at the time of his disablement. Section 44-a, extending the period of limitation in silicosis cases from one year to two years, does not deprive claimant of the other provisions of section 40. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Foster, P. J., Coon, Halpern, Imrie and Zeller, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Mlodozeniec v. Worthington Corp.
9 A.D.2d 21 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Claim of Gajewski v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.
1 A.D.2d 81 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 A.D. 1097, 139 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-minchie-v-corning-glass-works-nyappdiv-1955.