Claim of Miller v. Saratoga Onega Bottling Co.

271 A.D.2d 941

This text of 271 A.D.2d 941 (Claim of Miller v. Saratoga Onega Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Miller v. Saratoga Onega Bottling Co., 271 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

Appeal by an employer from a decision and award, made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board in favor of an infant claimant, as respects the award of double compensation allowed upon the ground of employment in violation of sections 131 and 132 of the Labor Law. While some of the deficiencies in the employment certificate separately considered may have been inconsequential, the cumulative effect of all of them was such as, under the evidence, to permit a finding of its invalidity with consequent illegality of employment. Decision and award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-miller-v-saratoga-onega-bottling-co-nyappdiv-1947.