Claim of Miller v. Lisk Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Miller v. Lisk Manufacturing Co.

244 A.D. 870

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal is denied, not because the claimant is at fault, but because the Industrial Board has neglected, for about six weeks after [871]*871the appeal was taken, to deliver to the Attorney-General the record upon which to make the findings. This denial may be a hardship to the claimant, but the carrier has the right tú be heard. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal is denied, not because the claimant is at fault, but because the Industrial Board has neglected, for about six weeks after [871]*871the appeal was taken, to deliver to the Attorney-General the record upon which to make the findings. This denial may be a hardship to the claimant, but the carrier has the right tú be heard. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Claim of Miller v. Lisk Manufacturing Co., 244 A.D. 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

244 A.D. 870 (Claim of Miller v. Lisk Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.