Claim of Miller v. Lisk Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Miller v. Lisk Manufacturing Co.

244 A.D. 870

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 244 A.D. 870 (Claim of Miller v. Lisk Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Miller v. Lisk Manufacturing Co., 244 A.D. 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal is denied, not because the claimant is at fault, but because the Industrial Board has neglected, for about six weeks after [871]*871the appeal was taken, to deliver to the Attorney-General the record upon which to make the findings. This denial may be a hardship to the claimant, but the carrier has the right tú be heard. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal is denied, not because the claimant is at fault, but because the Industrial Board has neglected, for about six weeks after [871]*871the appeal was taken, to deliver to the Attorney-General the record upon which to make the findings. This denial may be a hardship to the claimant, but the carrier has the right tú be heard. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D. 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-miller-v-lisk-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1935.