Claim of Miles v. Gibbs & Hill, Inc.
This text of 225 A.D. 839 (Claim of Miles v. Gibbs & Hill, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., and Hinman, J., dissent, on the ground that the act of claimant in striking the torpedo with his hammer, as he walked along the tracks, was not dictated or suggested by his employment or his employer’s interests, since he was not in the employ of the railway, but was a mere sportive act on his part which alone was responsible for his injury which did not arise out of his employment. (Frost v. Franklin Mfg. Co., 204 App. Div. 700; affd., 236 N. T. 649.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 A.D. 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-miles-v-gibbs-hill-inc-nyappdiv-1929.