Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Michalko v. City of New York

Claim of Michalko v. City of New York

39 A.D.2d 979
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 12, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 A.D.2d 979 (Claim of Michalko v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Michalko v. City of New York, 39 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed November 7, 1968, which referred the ease to an impartial opthalmologist on the questions of causal relation and disability. The decision of the board did not determine the merits of the claim. Therefore, it is a nonfinal decision and not appealable (Matter of Dunham v. Pettibone-Milliken Corp., 36 A D 2d 866). Appellant’s co-operation with the board’s decision should be viewed by her as acting in her own best interest. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Simons, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Acunzo v. Newsday, Inc.
140 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A.D.2d 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-michalko-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1972.