Claim of Melnikoff v. Melnik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Melnikoff v. Melnik

24 A.D.2d 783, 263 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3213

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 783 (Claim of Melnikoff v. Melnik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Melnikoff v. Melnik, 24 A.D.2d 783, 263 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

We find present here only issues of fact and credibility which the board has resolved against the claimant in the exercise of its fact-finding power, which, therefore, are not subject to our limited review (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23; e.g., Matter of Palermo v. Gallucci & Sons, 5 N Y 2d 529; Matter of Di Marco v. New York State Motor Vehicle Bureau, 23 A D 2d 898; Matter of Wood v. Colonial Tavern & Rest., 22 A D 2d 984, mot. for lv. to app. den. 15 N Y 2d 486; Matter of Potapchuk v. Kalda Constr. Co., 21 A D 2d 943; Matter of Finn v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott, 20 A D 2d 731; Matter of Duncan v. Trans-World Airlines, 19 A D 2d 666; Matter of Scarpullo v. Alba Barber Shop, 18 A D 2d 1122). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J.

We find present here only issues of fact and credibility which the board has resolved against the claimant in the exercise of its fact-finding power, which, therefore, are not subject to our limited review (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23; e.g., Matter of Palermo v. Gallucci & Sons, 5 N Y 2d 529; Matter of Di Marco v. New York State Motor Vehicle Bureau, 23 A D 2d 898; Matter of Wood v. Colonial Tavern & Rest., 22 A D 2d 984, mot. for lv. to app. den. 15 N Y 2d 486; Matter of Potapchuk v. Kalda Constr. Co., 21 A D 2d 943; Matter of Finn v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott, 20 A D 2d 731; Matter of Duncan v. Trans-World Airlines, 19 A D 2d 666; Matter of Scarpullo v. Alba Barber Shop, 18 A D 2d 1122). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 783, 263 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-melnikoff-v-melnik-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack