Claim of Melnikoff v. Melnik

24 A.D.2d 783, 263 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3213

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

We find present here only issues of fact and credibility which the board has resolved against the claimant in the exercise of its fact-finding power, which, therefore, are not subject to our limited review (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23; e.g., Matter of Palermo v. Gallucci & Sons, 5 N Y 2d 529; Matter of Di Marco v. New York State Motor Vehicle Bureau, 23 A D 2d 898; Matter of Wood v. Colonial Tavern & Rest., 22 A D 2d 984, mot. for lv. to app. den. 15 N Y 2d 486; Matter of Potapchuk v. Kalda Constr. Co., 21 A D 2d 943; Matter of Finn v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott, 20 A D 2d 731; Matter of Duncan v. Trans-World Airlines, 19 A D 2d 666; Matter of Scarpullo v. Alba Barber Shop, 18 A D 2d 1122). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.