Claim of Mehl v. R. L. Graziano Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Mehl v. R. L. Graziano Sons, Inc.

280 A.D. 905, 115 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6119

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 24, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 A.D. 905 (Claim of Mehl v. R. L. Graziano Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Mehl v. R. L. Graziano Sons, Inc., 280 A.D. 905, 115 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board awarding death benefits. Deceased employee was employed as a steam fitter. He was taken suddenly ill on May 16, 1950, while on the job engaged in cutting three-inch steel pipe by hand. He was taken home by a fellow employee, was sent to a hospital by his physician and died the following day as a result of an acute coronary occlusion. Appellants contend that there is no evidence of accidental injury and no evidence of causal relation. The record seems clear that it was the exertion of decedent’s work which brought about the attack, and ample medical evidence connects [906]*906decedent’s death with his employment. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board awarding death benefits. Deceased employee was employed as a steam fitter. He was taken suddenly ill on May 16, 1950, while on the job engaged in cutting three-inch steel pipe by hand. He was taken home by a fellow employee, was sent to a hospital by his physician and died the following day as a result of an acute coronary occlusion. Appellants contend that there is no evidence of accidental injury and no evidence of causal relation. The record seems clear that it was the exertion of decedent’s work which brought about the attack, and ample medical evidence connects [906]*906decedent’s death with his employment. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D. 905, 115 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mehl-v-r-l-graziano-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack